Comparative evaluation of heat treated retreatment files on canal transportation and dentin thickness in endodontically treated teeth: an in vitro CBCT study
PDF

Keywords

Cone-beam computed tomography [CBCT]
Endodontically treated teeth
Endodontic retreatment
Gutta-percha
Removal

How to Cite

BHATE, M., SOLETE, P., & MOHAN E, A. (2025). Comparative evaluation of heat treated retreatment files on canal transportation and dentin thickness in endodontically treated teeth: an in vitro CBCT study. International Arab Journal of Dentistry (IAJD), 16(2), 45-53. Retrieved from https://journals.usj.edu.lb/iajd/article/view/1482

Abstract

Introduction: Non-surgical retreatment is a conservative approach for managing recurrent endodontic infections requiring efficient removal of obturating material while preserving dentin. Retreatment file systems, through their design and function, play a vital role in ensuring effective cleaning and minimal structural compromise.

Methods: Forty-five extracted mandibular molars were decoronated and obturated at a standardized root length of 16 mm in both mesial canals. Samples were divided into three groups (n = 15): Group 1 – SoliteRS3, Group 2 – Dentsply Protaper Universal Retreatment Files, and Group 3 – Neoendo Retreatment Files. Pre- and postoperative CBCT scans were used to assess remaining dentin thickness, canal centering ability, and centering ratio. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests (p < 0.05).

Results: There was a statistically significant difference among the three file systems in all evaluated parameters (p < 0.05). SoliteRS3 showed better dentin preservation and superior centering ability.

Conclusions: SoliteRS3 files demonstrated superior dentin conservation and canal centering, making them a favorable choice for endodontic retreatment.

PDF